Dana Wefer
Case #
3240

Facebook censors user for her rant about being labeled "unvaccinated" and facts about the untenability of long-term monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine trials: A Twitter user shared a screenshot of her Facebook censorship notice. She had posted, in part: "I reject the term 'unvaccinated.' This is a label that has been put on me, but I consider it offensive. So do most other people I know who have chosen not to take any of the Covid-19 shots. I am not 'un' anything. I am me, the same as I've always been. Other people's decision to do something does not make me 'un' something. I will choose my own labels. We do need a term to distinguish people who have not taken any shots from those who have. And we will need other terms to distinguish those who have taken one or two from each other, as well as those who have taken three or more. Why? Well, because we are all part of the ongoing experiment. We do not know the long term effects of the Covid-19 pharmaceuticals because nobody knows the future. It is impossible to learn any long term effects without comparing these groups to each other, and preserving the control group. Aren't long term effects something everyone would want studied? For any pharmaceutical you take? The pharmaceutical companies destroyed the control groups by unblinding the studies and giving the control groups the shots, so there is no formal control group. The people who have chosen not to..." According to the screenshot, Facebook claimed that this violated its Community Standards "on misinformation that could cause physical harm," the post was deleted. It also showed that she was suspended form posting or commenting for three days.

Click images to enlarge

Suspension
YouTube
Suspension
X / Twitter
Suspension
YouTube
Suspension
X / Twitter
Suspension
X / Twitter
Suspension
X / Twitter
Suspension
Facebook
Deleted Content
YouTube
Deleted Content
YouTube