Steven Crowder
Case #
1396

Twitter restricts Steven Crowder from sharing a judicially confirmed finding of invalid ballots in Arizona: Steven Crowder tweeted a screenshot showing what happened when he attempted to RT a tweet from the Arizona Republican Party about its findings on review of a small sample of ballots, findings that were confirmed by a judge to contain 2% invalid ballots. When he attempted to re-tweet this tweet, which had a civic integrity notice on it warning that the claim about election fraud had been disputed despite it being judicially confirmed, Twitter put up a warning box that said: "This claim about election fraud is disputed! Help keep Twitter a reliable place for sharing info. Find out more before sharing." There is then a large "Find Out More" link that goes to a generic "no voter fraud" Twitter page. This page, titled "Voter fraud of any kind is exceedingly rare in the US, election experts confirm," contains an unattributed summary of Twitter's talking points that there is no voter fraud, as well as tweets from left-wing sources that all support Twitter's assertions about this. Below the "find out more" link is a very small link to allow the user to Quote Tweet the Tweet instead of simply re-tweeting it. Crowder had this to say about this censorship: "Go fuck yourself @Twitter, I literally retweeted voting irregularities confirmed by a judge."

Click images to enlarge

Restricted
X / Twitter
Sharing Restriction
X / Twitter
Sharing Restriction
X / Twitter
Sharing Restriction
X / Twitter
Civic Integrity Notice
X / Twitter
Civic Integrity Notice
X / Twitter
Civic Integrity Notice
X / Twitter
Civic Integrity Notice
X / Twitter
Civic Integrity Notice
X / Twitter